Sunday, July 19, 2026

Crowley, Joyce, Lewis Carroll and the Night of Pan

 "... each of these words can act as a switch, and we can move from one to another by means of many passages; hence the idea of a book which does not simply narrate one story, but a whole ocean of stories."
– Michel Butor, Introduction aux fragments de "Finnegans Wake."

The mathematical logic, puns, nonsense, word and sound play of Lewis Carroll has profoundly inspired the Hermetic arts. Reading an annotated version of the Alice stories provides much insight into the construction of James Joyce's masterpiece, Finnegans Wake. Many of Carroll's characters populate Joyce's Book of the Night. Humpty Dumpty, master of language, gets referenced on both the first and last page of the Wake. Anna Livia Plurabelle, Joyce's feminine archetype, has the same initials as Alice Pleasance Liddell, the Alice of Alice's Adventure's in Wonderland and Through the Looking Glass. Carroll would take Alice and her sisters rowing on a section of the Thames known locally around Oxford as the River Isis and tell them stories he made up off the top of his head. On one significant occasion Alice urged the professor to write the story down, and the rest is Herstory. Both Alice tales and FW get framed as dreams.

Aleister Crowley put Wonderland, Through the Looking Glass, and The Hunting of the Snark by Carroll on the A A reading list with a note beside each one: "Valuable to those who understand the Qabalah." He also titled a chapter in The Book of Lies after a couple of words from the nonsense poem "Jabberwocky" which appears in the first chapter of Through the Looking Glass. In Masks of the Illuminati by Robert Anton Wilson, the protagonist, Sir John Babcock receives the Complete Works of Lewis Carroll from his magick teacher with the explanation: "'Here,' he said gravely, 'is the condensed essence of Holy Cabala.'"
John Tenniel, The White Rabbit in the Queen's Court

Gilles Deleuze based his best (and most difficult) book of philosophy, The Logic of Sense primarily on a combination of Lewis Carroll's writings and the ancient Greek Stoics. Episodes from the Alice stories combine with lesser known Carroll writings, but he really champions Carroll's last major work, Sylvie and Bruno, calling it a masterpiece. Anyone reasonably familiar with esoteric literature will have heard the anecdote about the Zen monk who had a dream about being a butterfly, but when he awoke he didn't know if he was a monk dreaming of being a butterfly, or if he really was a butterfly now dreaming of being a monk. That duality defines the premise of Sylvie and Bruno: which is the dream and which is the waking reality? The reader must pay careful attention to which is which as the narrative frequently and seamlessly switches back and forth between the two realities, one seeming more dream-like than the other. Later, the two different worlds appear to comprise one of everyday, normal (as normal as can be in a Carroll story) reality and the world of fairies and magick. RAW shows his familiarity with Sylvie and Bruno by quoting from the infamous Gardner's song that runs throughout the story in the same Masks sequence.

Some time ago E.J. Gold recommended I reread Lewis Carroll every 5 years. Recently, he suggested that Wonderland may have similarities to bardo spaces. This appears borne out in Carroll's Preface to Sylvie and Bruno when he shifts gears to begin a discourse on death and the possibility of it occurring at any moment:

"Let me pause for a moment to say that I believe this thought, of the possibility of death – if calmly realised and steadily faced – would be one of the best possible tests as to our going to any scene of amusement being right or wrong. If the thought of sudden death acquires, for you, a special horror when imagined as happening in a theatre, then be very sure the theatre is harmful for you, however harmless it may be for others; and that you are incurring a deadly peril in going. Be sure the safest rule is that we shall not dare to live in any scene in which we dare not die.

But once we realise what the true object is in life – that it is not pleasure, not knowledge, not even fame itself, 'that last infirmity of noble minds' – but that it is the development of character, the rising to a higher, nobler, or purer standard, the building-up of the perfect (Wo)Man – and then, so long as we feel that this is going on, and will (we trust) go on for evermore, death has for us no terror; it is not a shadow but a light; not an end, but a beginning!"

Like Wilson, Crowley and implied by Joyce*, Carroll clearly advocates for personal, voluntary evolution (i.e. building character).

*For one example: "... and during mighty odd years this man of hod, cement and edifices in Toper's Thorp piled buildung supra buildung pon the banks for the livers by the Soangso." (FW, p. 4 emphasis added.) Experienced Wake readers will recognize the protagonist's initials, HCE, hence the personal nature; "buildung" suggests alchemy; also "bildung" = German for "education"; "supra" = Latin for "above" or "beyond."

The idea of some form of personal consciousness surviving the death of the physical body illustrates a theme both for the Thelemic philosophy of Aleister Crowley and for Finnegans Wake. A Book of the Dead intends to provides instructions along with a methodology for conquering death. Both the Wake and Magick appear heavily reliant on the Egyptian Book of the Dead (and they aren't the only ones; see The Western Lands by William Burroughs or listen to the musical translation on the album Seven Souls by Bill Laswell's Material.) John Bishop writes about the bardo Wake connection in a chapter in Joyce's Book of the Dark: "Joyce actively sought to have somebody write an essay exploring the Wake's affinities with this text" (the Egyptian Book of the Dead)

Going down the rabbit hole a little further with this, Crowley puts the practitioner's consciousness into the bardo by having them identify with Ankh-af-na-khonsu, a deceased Egyptian priest circa 700 B.C. A crucial message in the Egyptian Book of the Dead instructs the departing soul to unite themself with Osiris. Qabalistically, Osiris lives in Tiphareth. Crowley instructs his beginning students to direct all their magical efforts to realizing the Knowledge and Conversation of the Holy Guardian Angel, an operation which begins in Tiphareth.

I have been working with this kind of material for years via Crowley, Joyce and E.J. Gold's American Book of the Dead, a translation of the Tibetan Book of the Dead that John Lilly asked him to do in the early 1970s to help people who journeyed too far out on psychedelics. At that point, their ego and personality seems dead for all intents and purposes. Their consciousness directly confronts the bardo and they need help.

A premise I heard Gold give about 30 years ago, more recently repeated by Alan Chapman, holds that we live in the bardo now; that we have it backwards: what we call life actually appears more like death whereas when the body and ego die, true life begins if we have sufficient character developed (presence and attention) to tolerate it. I know this sounds implausible, maybe so. Unorthodox Sufis metaphorically put it in terms of sleep and waking. The ordinary life of identifying our "self" with a particular ego and personality along with the human conditioning and behavior we've been socially and culturally programed with, our so-called tunnel realities, represents immersion in sleep. Waking up from that sleep involves temporarily getting outside the limitations of our tunnel reality. Put in the context of Tim Leary's neurological model: when one or more of the terrestrial circuits dominates and we identify completely with that territory, it seems safe to say that sleep rules. 

Like any model or metaphor, the boundaries appear fuzzy. We can view the extremes of total vertical sleep and a complete waking state as two polarities on a spectrum. Sometimes we seem more awake, more present, less in our heads than at other times. I like to look at the eight circuits as if they comprise faders on a small mixing board. Usually, the first four faders have some position on the board, with faders five to eight very low or off. When getting into a gentle waking state through meditation or yoga, etc., faders two and four, the ego and personality will tend to go down or get completely turned off in the mix. Fader one, the bio-survival circuit will necessarily have to hold some position. The autonomic nervous system aspect of that fader will always run until biological death. 

Another premise, along with experiencing the bardo all the time, holds that we wake up several times a day. Usually the habits of sleep appear so entrenched that unfortunately these brief moments of higher consciousness slide right by unnoticed. The ideas of self-observation and self-remembering given in Gurdjieff's Fourth Way school intends to make one more aware of these glimpses of the waking state. 

Confronting death won't appeal to most people. We can content ourselves simply with the task of building character and ignore death. Trying to understand a difficult book like Finnegans Wake builds character. Engaging with the maze encountered in books of this nature develops a skill set that helps with navigating the maze of life. Lewis Carroll appears to advocate for love as a character builder. Being an Anglican Deacon, he was religious. He wanted to design a Children's Bible containing "carefully selected passages, suitable for a child's reading, and pictures. One principle of selection which I would adopt, would be that Religion should be put before a child as a revelation of love – no need to pain and puzzle the young mind with the history of crime and punishment." 

Reading Sylvie and Bruno builds character. Speaking of Life in the "Crossing the Line" chapter:
 
 "'And the secret of enjoying it,' he continued, resuming his cheerful tone, 
is intensity!'
   'But not in the modern aesthetic sense, I presume? Like the young lady in 
Punch, who begins a conversation with "Are you intense?'
     By no means! replied the Earl. What I mean is intensity of thought – a 
concentrated attention. We lose half the pleasure we might have in Life by not 
really attending.
    
The last chapter from the second book, Sylvie and Bruno Concluded, is titled "Life Out Of Death." It ends with Carroll's version of love is the law.



* * * * * * 

Aleister Crowley and James Joyce both promoted Female intelligence as a way to raise consciousness in general. They seem to have taken their cue from Francois Rabelais. I wrote about this a few years ago. The question as to whether Joyce knew Crowley and included him in Finnegans Wake inspired a couple of other previous essays, one here and another there. Recently, my friend Bob Campbell shared another section from the Wake that could support, as he put it, "the emerging bridge between Crowley and Joyce." The full section runs from p. 167.18 - 168.14. This occurs toward the end of  Chapter 6, the chapter that takes the form of a quiz. The section under consideration occurs as the conclusion of the eleventh answer (it has twelve questions in all) and, of course, eleven gives the number of magick or energy tending to change. 

Coincidences and synchronicities haunt the serious researcher of the Wake. Bob speaks of "the emerging bridge;" the first question of this "nightly quisquiquock" asks "What secondtonone myther rector and maximost bridges-maker was the first to rise taller through his beanstale . . ." (emphasis added; FW p.126). 

Going over over the most salient points: Bob starts with: "The trigger here is 'Mister Abby,' since potentially Joyce has already combined Crowley and Rabelais, as Oz pointed out, back on page 105, 'From Abbeygate to Crowalley.'"

"No! From Topsman to your Tarpeia! This thing, Mister Abby is nefand . . ."

The section begins with death. "Topsman" is older English slang for a Hangman. Tarpeia comes from Roman mythology, more specifically the historians Livey and Plutarch. She served as a vestal virgin (priestess) who betrayed Rome by letting their enemies, the Sabines, into the city. The Sabines were pissed at the Romans for abducting their woman. Tarpeia brokered a deal for her betrayal, but was herself tricked. After letting the enemy in, they crushed her to death.

Bob writes: "Nefand is an obsolete adjective meaning unspeakable, unmentionable, or morally abhorrent. Works for the wickedest man in the world, no?"

"Mister Abby" possibly exemplifies Joyce's blending of male and female energies given that Abby usually indicates a women's name. Another way to see it: tempering male energy with a feminine influence. Of course, looking at the mythic history "Topsman to your Tarpeia" suggests male energy crushing feminine influence. Using a Hermetic lens gives a different story: Topsman = Hangman = The Hanged Man (tarot) = male energy reversed. The Hanged Man corresponds with mem (Hebrew) = the element Water (a feminine element). Joyce writes "your Tarpeia" suggesting not the mythological character, but rather Mister Abby's (Crowley's?) Tarpeia who opens the doors to rescue the women.

Crowley started appearing all over the tabloids in the early 1920s after Raoul Loveday died while staying at the Abbey of Thelema in Sicily. Those tabloids made it to Paris and Joyce read newspapers. The tabloids put Crowley in a very negative light hence "This thing, Mister Abby, is nefand."

The thundering legion has stormed Olymp that it end. Twelve tabular times till now have I edicted it. Merus Genius to Careous Caseous! Moriture, te salutat!  My phemous themis race is run, so let Demoncracy take the highmost! 

Around 1923 Crowley wrote a short glowing review of Joyce calling him a genius. New Pearsons magazine, edited by Frank Harris, published it. Harris was a mutual friend of both Crowley and Joyce. Apparently some of his theories about Shakespeare made their way into Ulysses. Joyce paid attention to reviews. New Pearson's, an American magazine, could be found in Paris. If Joyce didn't see the article directly it seems that Harris would have brought his attention to it. Crowley spent a fair amount of time in Paris in the 1920s especially after getting kicked out of Italy. He socialized in bohemian and artistic circles. Joyce lived in Paris during that time and also socialized. It seems possible their paths may have crossed though no evidence for this, apart from the circumstance of proximity, has turned up.

As mentioned, Crowley called Joyce a genius. In the passage we see: "Merus Genius to Careous Caseous!" Translated from Latin it means roughly: "pure genius to decaying cheese." Breaking down "Merus" gives Mer + us. La mer = French for the sea. The ocean or sea is a feminine symbol. Caseous appears throughout this chapter and appears as a play on Caesar. Joyce profoundly influenced Thomas Pynchon. Pynchon connects Crowley with cheese in his most recent novel Shadow Ticket which you can read about here.

Moriture, te salutat = Latin for "He who is about to die salutes you." Historically it represents a phrase Roman gladiators shouted out to the Emperor before commencing their fight to death. Esoterically, it indicates the metaphorical death a male undergoes to get into the inner chamber vis-รก-vis The Hanged Man.

 "... so let Demoncracy take the highmost!" For most of human civilization in the West the common person was told that the only way to reach their God or Gods was through an intermediary, usually from the priestly caste. Crowley helped to democratize spiritual attainment. "Every man and every woman is a star." The Holy Guardian Angel registers as a daemon in the ancient Greek, Socratic sense.

My unchanging Word is sacred. -> "Change not as much as the style of a letter." – from Bob; the second half comes from The Book of the Law I:54

The word is my Wife, to exponse and expound, to vend and to
velnerate, and may the curlews crown our nuptias! Till Breath
us depart! Wamen. Beware would you change with my years. Be
as young as your grandmother!  
– the valorization of women. Curlews are birds symbolically connected with the new moon due to the shape of their beak. 

The entire second half of this section reads:

Adversus hostem semper sac!  Latin for "Always be brave against the enemy!" Detractors of either Crowley and/or Joyce?

She that will not feel my ful-
moon let her peel to thee as the hoyden and the impudent! That
mon that hoth no moses in his sole
(not bound by traditional Judaism?) nor is not awed by conquists of word's law, who never with humself was fed and leaves
his soil to lave his head,
(lave = Latin for "wash") when his hope's in his highlows from
whisking his woe, if he came to my preach, a proud pursebroken
(both JJ and AC struggled financially)
ranger, when the heavens were welling the spite of their spout,
to beg for a bite in our bark Noisdanger, would meself and Mac
Jeffet, four-in-hand, foot him out? — ay! — were he my own
breastbrother,
(In this chapter the questions are asked by Shem and answered by Shaun who are brothers; however, "breastbrother" appears close to "beastbrother;" obviously, AC = beast. It also seems another feminization of the male since breast usually suggests the female anatomy as in The Book of the Breast by RAW.)

my doubled withd love and my singlebiassed hate,  – the first part rewards contemplation of it; singlebiassed hate might mean hate for seeing something from only one point of view or perspective.

were we bread by the same fire and signed with the same salt, (both bread and salt have the same Hebrew letters that add to 78 by Gematria; worth looking up in Sepher Sephiroth; or my Pynchon review linked to above.) 

had we tapped from the same master and robbed the same till, ( I suspect this refers to Rabelais; see link above)
were we tucked in the one bed and bit by the one flea, homo-
gallant and hemycapnoise, bum and dingo, jack by churl, though
it broke my heart to pray it, still I'd fear I'd hate to say!

That concludes the answer to the eleventh question. The brief twelfth question and answer ends chapter 6.

12. Sacer esto? (Latin for "Be sacred?")
Answer: Semus sumus! 

Bob concludes his contribution with:

"Also, at the end "Semus sumus!" - we are the same, or, we are Shem!
Both have penned attempts at new holy books. The Book of the Law and Finnegans WakeMaybe!"

There's possibly more Crowley/Hermetic related material in this section. There's a play on salt and saltpeter – "soldpewter" and "forceglass" all strongly suggest Alchemy; pewter is a very strong alloy; glass symbolizes crystallization from volatility to something solid. One may also find more similarity with Chapter 1 of The Book of the Law

As you will see, the parallels in the maps and models that Crowley and Joyce stake out makes it seem like they're exploring the same, vast unknown territory (the bardo or the subconscious mind?) from different, but overlapping approaches. Each one helps to understand the other.

* * * * * *
Another area Joyce and Crowley have in common – the Night of Pan. It seems Crowley made up this term/magical formula. I first saw it in The Book of Lies (1913); that's where it may have first seen the light of day. I've never heard Joyce use that phrase, nor seen a reference to it in FW yet, but the Wake seems undeniably a Night of Pan – a night with everything in it. This Night reminds me of the Bardo or Crossing the Abyss, but it also represents the feminization, or female application, of male energy as Crowley makes clear in Chapter 29, "The Southern Cross" in the BoL.  In this book, Laylah serves as Crowley's Scarlet Woman/Babalon/ female archetype and he notes that "Laylah is the Arabic for 'Night'." Also, Nuit is the French word for night.

I know of at least two instances where Robert Anton Wilson directly compares The Book of Lies with Finnegans Wake. The first occurred in the Crowley 101 online course and appears in my Foreword to Lion of Light. The second comes from a radio interview, a transcription of which will appear in a new excellent RAW book coming out relatively soon called Maybe Magick. In that book Wilson is asked something like which Crowley book influenced him the most and it seems a toss up between The Book of the Law and The Book of Lies though he does indicate a preference and says why he likes each one.

Most, if not all, of The Book of Lies seemingly concerns the Night of Pan in one way or another. The first line in Chapter 1 "The Sabbath of the Goat" reads: 

"O! the heart of N.O.X, the Night of Pan."

Crowley gives the formula of N.O.X. in chapter 1 and its commentary.
N. = Death by its tarot attribution.
O. = the Phallus, the redeemer, by its tarot attribution The Devil, the strongest male energy in the deck.
X. = the Cross; it relates to Pan by the 4 cardinal points of the cross extending infinitely.

The N. and O. look identical to Crowley's ON formula which has been explained ad infinitum by Jerry Cornelius and others. But real briefly:

O = Aiyn, the path that connects Hod with Tiphareth on The Tree of Life. Considered masculine, it compares to Yang from the Chinese system. 

N = Nun, the path that connects Netzach with Tiphareth. Considered feminine, it compares to Yin from the Chinese system.

X = the Cross, or more completely the Rosy Cross = Tiphareth

In N.O.X. the N and O reverses ON which corresponds with the reversal of male and female energies.

Schrรถdinger's Cat by Robert Anton Wilson, one of his more profound occult transmissions, begins with a quote acknowledging the importance of this reversal:

"Not until the male becomes female and the female becomes male shall ye enter the Kingdom of Heaven."
– Jesus, in The Gospel of Thomas

In the N.O.X. formula, the feminine N signals the Death (or reversal) of ordinary yang energy, (O) i.e. unbalanced male energy; the kind of toxic masculinity that recently ended the political campaigns of Graham Plattner and Eric Swalwell in the U.S.A. But it's not always sexual; it appears the same dominant force that starts wars and drops bombs on people, places and things. These give extreme examples. Every heterosexual male has to deal with this kind of male energy.

The N.O.X. formula doesn't simply represent an intellectual model. It describes a function; something you do – a kind of work. This work also = the work of the Rosy Cross. It requires a male aspect and a female aspect. Although most literally done as a sexual working with two individuals, one adopting an active function, the other passive, it can be done anywhere, anytime by an active individual lifting up a passive individual astrally.

The O. part of the formula, the phallus, remains male, but takes on a feminized approach through the death of unconstrained male sexuality. The N. and O. combine then go on the cross, i.e. X. E.J. Gold calls this the "Man on the Cross." In Freudian terms, the Rose symbolizes the female with the Cross symbolizing the phallic male. Reversed in the N.O.X. formula, the phallic male = the Rose. A phallic generation and radiation of energy, also called L.V.X. or blood. The female now represents the Cross – all  manifested Creation.

I can only scratch the surface here, but Crowley also combines the male and female in BoL chapter 77 where he merges his Scarlet Woman, Laylah  with a He-Goat. Goat may freak out orthodox Christians as it suggests the Devil, and Crowley does play with this. It helps to know and apply Qabalah, some programs die hard. Goat = 83 = "love in its highest form." Crowley also identified with the androgynous goat-headed figure of Baphomet which figures into all of this. I'll leave this thread open to explore. BoL chapter 33 is titled Baphomet.




Feminizing the phallus – dying to or reversing standard male energy (as in The Hanged Man) seems extremely difficult for the average heterosexual male. The Book of the Law III:22 mentions "Ordeal x" which may reference this difficulty (shout-out to L.V.X. 15 for bringing my attention to it). Dressing in drag frequently occurred in traditional shamanism to help the male shaman adopt a feminine posture. Bisexual or gay men appear to naturally have an easier time becoming-woman (as Gilles Deleuze puts it). Some cultural examples may help. Mick Jagger has often been cited as energetically expressing androgyny. "Sympathy for the Devil" seems a very Crowley-type song if you catch the reversals. Groucho Marx, whom I don't believe had a bisexual history, nicely exemplifies a feminized phallic energy in many of his films. The comedian/actor Eddie Izzard appears another great example particularly in his comedy special, Dressed to Kill.

The N.O.X. formula and the material in the BoL appear very relevant to the crisis known as Crossing the Abyss. I won't go too far into that here. The initiate going through this is instructed to (metaphorically) put every drop of their blood into the cup of Babalon. This seems another way of expressing the death of base male energy. Going on the Cross, the Man on the Cross, as given by N.O.X.  provides a pun for Crossing the Abyss. That's usually thought of as occurring only one major time climbing up the Tree of Life, but I suspect it happens frequently in smaller ways. Also, it seems to me that physical death marks a crossing of some kind of abyss by the individual consciousness, maybe. 

My current favorite example of a phallic femininity is Queen's lead vocalist Freddie Mercury. An excellent performance illustrating this comes from their 1986 Live at Wembley concert available on disc or on You Tube, one of Queen's last shows before Freddie got too sick to perform. Another stellar performance by Queen occurred at their much shorter Live Aid set also viewable on You Tube. Their piece, "Bohemian Rhapsody," a Mercury composition, is the best song I've heard about Crossing the Abyss. But you have to hear the studio version to catch that as they would drop the introduction – "Is this the real life, or is this just fantasy" – for the live shows. One also has to be able to hear the pun in "nothing really matters."

Another semiotic for the N.O.X./Rosy Cross function: the SC = 68 combination. 6 = Tiphareth; 8 = Mercury = communication; communicate beauty. One verse in The Book of the Law instructs the reader to come up with new symbols. In Magick in Theory and Practice Crowley explains his rationale for having the English F correspond with the Hebrew Vau whereas traditionally it corresponds with Pe. Traditionally a hard sounding C corresponds with Kaph = 20 while a soft C corresponds with Cheth = 8. I suggest that the C in the SC combo corresponds with Cheth whether hard or soft. If one pays attention, one can find this semiotic throughout Wilson's fiction and in much of Thomas Pynchon's work, particularly in Gravity's Rainbow. 68 appears on the first page of Illuminatus!  One can find it in some of James Joyce's books and it briefly appears in Deleuze's The Logic of Sense. Though it dates back to Rabelais, Crowley found the sense of it in The Paris Working, one of his most important operations. It shows up a few times in The Book of the Law as for example I:6: "Be thou Hadit, my secret centre, my heart & my tongue!"

The BoL doesn't make an exception. Chapter 1 has the line: "Cast the Seed into the Field of Night." The caps appear in the original; F+N = Nuit. This looks commensurate with giving every drop of blood into the cup of Babalon. Chapter 29 "The Southern Cross" and its commentary holds importance to this discussion as mentioned above. We find both the SC and the cross. It can also be seen as an instruction for going on the cross astrally, or in one's imagination. The fact that it's southern indicates to imagine the cross behind you. The active initiate, working to become a rose, visualizes a specific woman they know and love to go on the cross. Much easier said than done. The commentary says: "Chapter 29 continues Chapter 28" so that also helps provide the picture. Coincidentally, I lived in a hotel called The Southern Cross for about three weeks when working in Sydney, Australia on two different occasions.

"Here's another clue for you all, the Walrus was Paul" as John Lennon sings in Glass Onion. Another clue for going On the Cross (pun intended with on): N.O.X. = 210. RAW explains this number somewhere; the Rose and the Cross become one then, when perfectly balanced, cancel each other out to become none. Related to this, BoL Chapter 57, "The Duck-Billed Platypus" looks at the Rosy Cross.

* * * * * * 

I don't have a lot of examples of a feminine phallus from Finnegans Wake and don't have much time to look as I want this up in time for Maybe Day 2026, but here's one that also recalls Crowley:

"I am told by our interpreter, Hanner Esellus, that there are fully six hundred and six ragwords in your malherbal Magis lande-guage in which wald wand rimes alpman . . ." FW, p. 478

Alpman indicates the female phallus as Alp gives the initials of Anna Livia Plurabelle. Hanner Esellus has the initials of the male pronoun with the female name Ann inside Hanner; "which wald wand" shows the initials 666. The rest I'll leave up to the interested reader who loves to decipher things. Looking up 606 proves interesting.

Regarding N.O.X. or the Man on the Cross: And let every crisscouple be so crosscomplimentary, little eggons, youlk and meelk, in a farbiger pancosmos.FW p. 613.

Killing, controlling, or reversing brutal male sexual expression is not new. In the Bible, Isaiah 66:24 reads: "And they shall go forth, and look upon the carcasses of the men that have transgressed against me: for their worm shall not die, neither shall their fire be quenched; and they shall be an abhorring unto all flesh" (emphasis added).

Nuit speaking in the Book of the Law: "But to love me is better than all things: if under the night stars in the desert thou presently burnest mine incense before me, invoking me with a pure heart, and the Serpent flame therein, thou shalt come a little to lie in my bosom. For one kiss wilt thou then be willing to give all; but whoso gives one particle of dust shall lose all in that hour." – I:61
In the Bible dust symbolizes flesh, the physical body.

This theme repeats itself from Hadit's point of view in the second chapter:  "I am uplifted in thine heart; and the kisses of the stars rain hard upon thy body.

 Thou art exhaust in the voluptuous fullness of the inspiration; the expiration is sweeter than death, more rapid and laughterful than a caress of Hell's own worm." II:62 & 63

 Lewis Carroll gives his version with a poem in the first chapter of Through the Looking Glass:

Jabberwocky

'Twas brillig, and the slithy toves
Did gyre and gimble in the wabe:
All mimsy were the borogroves,
And the mome raths outgrabe

"Beware the Jabberwock, my son!
The jaws that bite, the claws that catch!
Beware the Jubjub bird, and shun
The frumious Bandersnatch!"

He took his vorpal sword in hand:
Long time the manxome foe he sought
So rested he by the Tumtum tree,
And stood awhile in thought.

And, as in uffish thought he stood,
The Jabberwock, with eyes of flame,
Came whiffling through the tulgey wood,
And burbled as it came!

One, two! One, two! And through and through
The vorpal blade went snicker-snack
He left it dead, and with its head
He went galumphing back.

"And has thou slain the Jabberwock?
Come to my arms, my beamish boy!
O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!"
He chortled in his joy.

'Twas brillig, and the slithy toves
Did gyre and gimble in the wabe:
All mimsy were the borogroves,
And the mome raths outgrabe

Regarding the line: "Long time the manxome foe he sought" Martin Gardner notes in The Annotated Alice that "Manx was the Celtic name for the Isle of Man." In another note, he mentions "a striking similarity between (original illustrator John) Tenniel's Jabberwock and the dragon being slain by Saint George in a painting by Paolo Uecello, in London's National Gallery."

Jabberwock by John Tenniel

Crowley appropriates two of the nonsense words, Mome Raths for the title of Chapter 48 in The Book of Lies. Humpty Dumpty interprets mome as being short for "from home" and rath as "a sort of green pig (Through the Looking Glass, Chapter 6). Pig adds to 93; green corresponds with Daleth = door = Venus = love. Daleth represents the path that connects Binah (archetypal mom) with Chokmah (archetypal dad) on the Tree of Life. In Crowley's note for the chapter, he interprets them differently: mome = young girl; 
rathe = early. Chapter 48 opens with:

The early bird catches the worm; and the twelve-year-old prostitute attracts the ambassador.
Neglect not the dawn-meditation!

Dragons are sometimes known as worms; we see two instances above of worm symbolizing base male energy. The second half of the first line gives a look at the disgusting side with the pedophile ambassador when the worm isn't caught. 

This huge subject doesn't really end, but I'll wrap things up with a quote from Finnegans Wake which will make everything perfectly clear:

"Sole shadow shows. Tis jest jibberweek's joke. It must have stole. O,
keve silence, both! Putshameyu! I have heard her voice some-
where else's before me in these ears still that now are for mine.
  Let op. Slew musies. Thunner in the eire.
  You were dreamend, dear."FW, p. 565

Thursday, June 18, 2026

The Occult Timothy Leary

 


The Occult Timothy Leary by Joseph L. Flatley makes a significant contribution to the secondary literature around the illustrious life and times of the always controversial Dr. Timothy Leary. In the popular mind Leary often gets remembered as an evangelist for drug experimentation and one of the  prime instigators of the 1960s counterculture. Like one of his colorful predecessors, Aleister Crowley, much of his profound philosophical research and exploration gets hidden beneath the notoriety and controversy surrounding the man. Flatley intends to alter that perception by focusing on the Hermetic side of Leary culminating in a unique presentation of the eight-circuit neurological model of consciousness as reflected in the subtitle: The Tarot, Magical States, and Post-Terrestrial Evolution. He instantly won me over with a quote from Finnegans Wake before the proceedings began.

The book has two distinct sections. Part 1 provides a biography of Leary's life in approximately one hundred pages. Flatley does an excellent job sketching out all the salient points of his "Many Lives" with a particular emphasis on anything occult. A reader unfamiliar with the good Doctor or only aware of his popular image will find enough information for a balanced portrait of the man. At the other end of the spectrum, readers like myself who have read everything by and about Leary they could find will  discover new interesting facts and anecdotes. As a fan of Leary, I found this compelling reading. I couldn't put the book down except when I got into the shower. Flatley shows meticulous research turning up brilliant gems of stories. 

The primary occult connection explored in the first half of the book concerns Aleister Crowley whom Leary called himself the reincarnation of. People who take that to literally mean the transmigration of Crowley's soul into the body of baby Leary find that beyond baffling given that Timothy came into the world (1920) many years before Crowley enjoyed his Greater Feast (1947). What Leary means by reincarnation is told in the book. A You Tube video can be found where Leary states that "I'm carrying on much of the work he (Crowley) started." We also discover that Crowley wasn't the only famous magician Leary claimed to reincarnate.

I only know of two events that directly ties Leary to Crowley; Flatley examines both of them. The first concerns a synchronicity wherein Tim and his friend Brian Barritt had a powerful psychedelic episode they later found out occurred in the same spot where Crowley and his chela Victor Neuberg scryed the Enochian aethyrs in the desert near Bou Saada, Algeria. This Enochian working was documented in The Vision and the Voice. The book uses Barritt's partner Liz Elliot's account to tell the story. Elliot embellishes the event by claiming that Crowley and Neuberg "took their mescaline" when no evidence exists for that claim. Crowley certainly used peyote, known as anhalonium lewinii at the time, to access the visionary space, but evidently, judging by his diaries, not for those Enochian workings. His diaries go into great detail about how he gained access to those spaces. They appear to have been realized strictly through ceremonial magick and a specific mantra practice; no psychoactive substances. Mescaline was first synthesized from peyote in 1919; this magick occurred in 1909. This doesn't make the synchronicity any less amazing. 

The most obvious parallel between Crowley and Leary concerns their use of psychedelics to expand consciousness. There's no evidence Leary experimented with any Thelemic practices like the rituals of the pentagram and hexagram unlike his partner in crime Robert Anton Wilson, a prominent secondary character in TOTL. The stories with Wilson provide an added bonus to the book. It seems Leary went through a Crowley phase mainly after his escape from prison through to his recapture in Afghanistan and subsequent reimprisonment. 

The second half of the book looks at the eight circuit neurological model of consciousness Leary formulated through the lens of the Tarot. This comes from The Game of Life by Leary with contributions by Robert Anton Wilson originally published by Peace Press in 1979 with a second edition coming out in 1993 by New Falcon. Flatley describes the structure of this model with each circuit having three stages for a total of 24 stages and how Leary assigned the 22 trumps of the Major Arcana to each of the stages while coining two additional Tarot trumps for stages 22 and 24. He begins by giving a brief history of the Tarot before examining each stage through its associated Tarot card and the astrological sign associated with it. For instance, stage 1, bio-survival receptivity is looked at through the lens of the first trump, The Fool and the Zodiac sign Pisces. It should be noted that the correspondences from the Zodiac appear to be entirely Leary's creation and have no relation to the Thoth Tarot or the Tarot of the Golden Dawn. The Zodiac only has 12 signs so only 12 Tarot trumps correspond with the Zodiac in the conventional system. Leary doubles up the Zodiac signs to match his formulation of 24 stages. Pisces corresponds with stage 1 while Pisces 2 corresponds with stage 13 in the model. The logic of this does make sense as we shall see shortly. 

Each stage in TOTL begins with Leary's illustration of the Tarot card as it appears in The Game of Life with a slight modification from Flatley. For instance THE FOOL looks like: 


This appears exactly the same in The Occult Timothy Leary except the top left and bottom right corner Ace of Diamonds signifiers have been replaced by the number 1 to indicate stage 1. This follows for each of the stages with the stage number replacing the playing card signifier Leary has. The Game of Life uses the Ace to 9 of Diamonds then the Jack, Queen and King of Diamonds to represent the 12 stages of the first four circuits which he called terrestrial. The post-terrestrial stages(13 - 24) uses the same playing card numbering but switches to the suit of hearts.

One thing I didn't know until reading this new book is that Leary's tarot correspondences originally appeared in his unpublished book The Periodic Table of Energy the substance of which became The Game of Life. This may or may not account for the slight and largely insignificant discrepancy in the Death card. Flatley maintains that Leary changed the name of the card to DEATH HORSE. In the second edition of The Game of Life this card goes by THE SKELETON HORSE in one place then DEATH-REBIRTH on the following page.

Leary applied the conventional order of the tarot for each successive stage with the exception of switching THE EMPRESS and HIGH PRIESTESS cards for stages 3 and 4.

Flatley does a superb job laying out the connection between the neurological stages and the Tarot trumps. It makes for a nice concise introduction to Leary's model with each section giving Keywords, Traditional meanings (Leary's card interpretations appear decidedly untraditional) and my favorite – Questions to consider in a reading. The latter provokes self examination. For instance, in stage 15 the question gets asked, "Are you finding a balance between indulgence and moderation in your sensory experiences?" 

The final chapter consists of how to use Timothy's tarot for divination. Flatley shows his rigorous research by discovering a tarot reading by Leary found amongst his personal papers housed at the New York Public Library. This building can be seen in the opening shot of Ghostbusters, an extremely esoteric film in its own right, but I digress. What I find very interesting is that Flatley dug up the method Leary devised for a Tarot spread directly related to the neuro-circuits. Like a Robert Anton Wilson book or article on the circuits, The Occult Timothy Leary both provides the information and suggests ways to use it for personal evolution; magick in theory and practice.

Leary's tarot only uses the Major Arcana, the 22 trumps and the two additional cards he made up. Flatley references Robert Anton Wilson to bring in the Minor Arcana, the pip cards and the court cards in the four suits of Wands, Cups, Swords and Pentacles (or Coins). Each suit corresponds to one of the four elements: Wands = fire, Cups = water, Swords = air, Pentacles = earth. Wilson (incorrectly, in my view) attributes each of the suits to one of the four terrestrial circuits appearing in Prometheus Rising (Hilaritas, p. 118) like this:

Y  fire     wands      CIRCUIT IV
H  water  cups        CIRCUIT  II
V  air      swords     CIRCUIT III
H  earth  pentacles  CIRCUIT I

The letters in the left column, YHVH, represent the four-fold name of God: Yod He Vau He. The attributions look correct EXCEPT for the circuits. Note the out of sequence circuit numbering in the far right column going IV, II, III, I. In my view, circuits I and IV make better sense when switched to make the attributions look like this:
 
Y  fire     wands      CIRCUIT I
H  water  cups        CIRCUIT  II
V  air      swords     CIRCUIT III
H  earth  pentacles  CIRCUIT IV

This has the first circuit corresponding with fire while the fourth circuit corresponds with earth. Circuit IV, the Socio-Sexual, makes a composite of circuits I - III just as earth forms a composite of the three pure elements of fire, water and air.

Interestingly, right below these attributions Wilson provides Carl Jung's attributions from Psychology and Alchemy (PR p. 117) which RAW correctly assigns to the circuits with the first circuit corresponding to fire as it should, in my view.

Note that with the switch the circuits now appear in the same order that they get turned on in the body. In the Game of Life Dr. Tim also correlates the Wands/Fire suit with circuit I. This doesn't mean I'm right and Flatley/Wilson are wrong. As Crowley puts it in The Book of Thoth:

"It seems hardly possible to define these terms in such a way as to make their meaning clear to the student. SHe must discover for hirself by constant practice what they mean to hir. It does not even follow that SHe will arrive at the same ideas. This will not mean that one mind is right and the other wrong, because each one of us has hir own universe all to hirself, and it is not the same as anyone else's universe." (Quotation modified to reflect Leary's use of generalized personal pronouns.)

* * * * * * 

The occult emphasis in the book appears squarely on connections between Leary and Crowley as made crystal clear by the cover illustration showing the good Doctor posing like a famous Aleister Crowley photo in the posture of the Hierophant (see above). However, I would argue that G.I. Gurdjieff had an equal if not stronger influence on Leary's thinking. In his dedication for Info–Psychology (Falcon, 1987) Leary places Gurdjieff at the top. It reads in full:

"This book celebrates all
Evolutionary Agents
And Cyber–punks
On this Planet and Elsewhere
Especially

Georges I. Gurdjieff
           who made us laugh
Aleister Crowley
            who did the English translation
To Israel Regardie
             who kept the Falcon flying high
To Thomas Pynchon
          who gave the American version
To William Gibson
           first of our species to circumnavigate
           the Info-World
           In his novels NEUROMANCER, COUNT ZERO,
           BURNING CHROME, MONA LISA OVERDRIVE
           Gibson has outlined the Cyber-Info
           Society of the near future"

TOTL begins chapter 1 with a story Tim told in his autobiography, Flashbacks (J.P. Tarcher, 1983) about his grandfather telling him at a young age to "Never do anything like anyone else, boy." This is a slightly different iteration of a well-known story Gurdjieff tells near the beginning of Beelzebub's Tales to His Grandson. In Gurdjieff's earlier version his grandmother lies on her death bed:

  "'Eldest of my grandsons! Listen and always remember my strict injunction to you: In life never do as others do'
    Having said this, she gazed at the bridge of my nose and, evidently noticing my perplexity and my obscure understanding of what she had said, added somewhat angrily and imperiously:
    "Either do nothing – just go to school – or do something nobody else does.'"

She dies immediately after giving Gurdjieff this advice. It seems likely that both stories were fabricated, but they make an important point. I find it funny and a little paradoxical for Leary to tell the same story about being different though arguably he does make it different by changing the source to his grandfather. I believe Leary repeats Gurdjieff's story as a way of aligning himself to the same esoteric lineage. I last saw Leary speak at a club in New York called the Wetlands toward the end of 1990. He introduced his assistant as Gurdjieff's grandson.

I'm very grateful Flatley includes this anecdote: "'He (Leary) told me that the circuits were derived from Gurdjieff,' Rushkoff says." I have always believed that to be true, but would be hard pressed to find a citation for that knowledge. Fortunately I don't have to now. Familiarity with Gurdjieff's Fourth Way system provides a valuable background to understanding Leary's model of the brain circuits. Two primary principles Gurdjieff espoused are the Law of Octaves and the Law of Threes. These are most easily researched in In Search of the Miraculous by P.D. Ouspensky. The Law of Octaves derives from the discovery by Pythagoras of the diatonic musical scale in which the eighth note, called the octave, is exactly twice the frequency of the first note when ascending. Scale comes from the Latin scala which means ladder. The Law of Threes states that all manifested phenomena comprises three forces which he designated as active/affirming, passive/denying, and neutralizing/reconciling. This law resonates with various archetypes and principles related to 3 as for example the Christian trinity, the supernal Sephiroth in Kabbalah and even Ohm's law in electricity which states that V = IR;  voltage V (reconciling) = current I (active) multiplied by resistance R (denying). Flatley compares the 3 stages for each circuit with the Trimurti group of Gods in Hinduism – Brahma the creator, Shiva, the destroyer and Vishnu, the preserver. Following Leary, he also connects them to the three aspects of neural synapses – the microscopic junctions where neurons communicate with each other (TOTL p. 115). 

Leary's 8 circuits do not rigorously follow the musical aspects of the Law of Octaves, but the 3 stages in each circuit closely resemble the Law of Threes. Gurdjieff often described ordinary humans as 3 brained beings. Understanding the nature of each of these brains (also called centrums) can go a long way toward understanding the neurological model based upon them. The first one is the moving or instinctive centrum which handles all the physical functions of the body. I think of it as the physical brain. This corresponds with Leary's circuit 1 the Biosurvival. The second one is the emotional centrum or the Emotional-Territorial of circuit 2. The third brain is the intellectual centrum or the Semantic circuit as TOTL has it. 

It seems a basic initial stepping stone, especially in the area of self-observation, to comprehend the first three circuits as the physical, emotional and intellectual aspects of the nervous system. Gurdjieff didn't clearly formulate a fourth brain but he does have a higher emotional centrum (circuit 6) and a higher intellectual or mental centrum (circuit 7). In CT1 RAW fills in the missing Gurdjieffian centrums as False Personality = circuit 4; the magnetic Centrum = circuit 5; and The Essence as circuit 8. Both Leary and Wilson changed the names of the higher circuits as their research and speculation evolved. Flatley uses Leary's original names as they appeared in Exo-Psychology and this is how they appeared in CT1. The original terminology makes the most sense to me so I agree with Flatley on that point. In the Game of Life, Leary changed the name of circuit 6 from the Neuro-electric to the Neurophysical. (For reasons unknown to me, the inconsistent use of the hyphen reflects both Leary and Wilson's nomenclature.) By the time of Info-Psychology [A Revision of Exo-Psychology] Leary has circuit 6 as "A Neurogenetic ontology" and circuit 7 as "A Neurogenetic teleology." Two pages later he refers to C6 as a Cyberelectronic phase and C7 as a Cybergenetic phase which reflects the original terminology. In Prometheus Rising Wilson calls C6 the Neurogenetic Circuit and C7 the Metaprogramming Circuit. By the time of Quantum Psychology, first published seven years later, RAW no longer calls them "circuits" changing them to "systems." C6  is now the Metaprogramming System with C7 named the Morphogenetic System. I find these differences in nomenclature helpful, not contradictory. They all serve to further the instruction inscribed upon the entrance to the Temple of Apollo (the Sun god) at Delphi: Know Thyself.

Comparing the Gurdjieffian centrums with Leary's circuits as presented by Flatley, we'll see a clear correspondence between the terrestrial and post-terrestrial circuits.

                            Leary                                   Gurdjieff
Terrestrial

Circuit 1              Biosurvival                         Moving
Circuit 2              Emotional-Territorial           Emotional
Circuit 3              Semantic                            Intellectual
Circuit 4              Socio-Sexual                      Personality

Post-Terrestrial

Circuit 5             Neurosomatic                     Magnetic Center
Circuit 6             Neuroelectric                      Higher Emotional
Circuit 7             Neurogenetic                      Higher Intellectual
Circuit 8             Neuroatomic                       The Essence

The most obvious ones are C2 Emotional with C6 Higher Emotional and C3 Intellectual with C7 Higher Intellectual. It appears C2 and 6 represent different modalities of the same system; likewise C3 and 7.
C1 concerns the functioning of the body and takes imprints soon after birth. C5 activation turns on the body's senses. The correspondence between C1 and 5 appears more obvious with Leary (soma means body). C4 and C8 don't show a clear correspondence, but I speculate they may show a similarity with C4 giving a composite of C 1-3; perhaps C8 represents a composite of the post-terrestrial circuits, though maybe not.

C1 represents the body. Trying practices that turns on the body like yoga or martial arts activates C5.
C2 suggests the heart. Opening the heart chakra gets you to C6. 
C3 connects with the mind. Learning to control thoughts (very difficult) and focus the mind gives an approach to C7 ... maybe. I say maybe because I've personally not experienced this circuit. I have experienced some of the psionic attributes grouped within the C6 territory by extensively working to reach the Knowledge and Conversation of the Holy Guardian an operation that begins in Tiphareth, i.e. the heart.

* * * * * * 

Flatley gives an account of the conditions following Tim's terminal prostrate cancer diagnosis leading up to his death. He leaves out a couple of points, one of which looks very occult. Leary's good friend John Lilly asked Glenn and Lee Perry, owners of the Samadhi Tank Co. to set up a floatation tank for him in his house to help with the transition. They went down to L.A. and set it up and in the process gave him a copy of The American Book of the Dead by E.J. Gold. Leary had written of rituals found inside it in an article years earlier called "Commonsense Alternatives to Involuntary Death" later included in the book Chaos and Cyberculture. Lee Perry related to me that after giving the book to Tim he started playing word games with the text on the back cover.

Leary originally planned to have his head removed after death and cryogenically frozen then changed his mind, as related in TOTL. However, in a film made by Paul Davids, Timothy Leary's Dead, about his final year leading up to and including his death, we see his head being severed for preservation. It can be viewed for free on Tubi. The final shot in the film before the credits roll shows a close-up of his severed head. This turns out to be a theatrical stunt, but looks very realistic. I thought this absolutely brilliant because of its qabalistic implications illustrating another close affinity with Crowley. The Hebrew letter Resh translates to English as Head and corresponds with The Sun tarot card. The Sun corresponds with Tiphareth. Crowley once stated (in The Confessions of Aleister Crowley) that his primary goal in life involved turning people on to the Knowledge and Conversation of the Holy Guardian Angel, an operation beginning in Tiphareth. This appears synonymous with the discovery of one's True Will, i.e. one's life purpose; the answer to the question, why are you here?" Timothy Leary symbolically carried on Crowley's work until the very end. TOTL relates the last word Leary spoke which happens to serve as a keyword for Tiphareth.

* * * * * * 

I only have one major criticism. Leary's three stages for each circuit describes the functions of reception, integration and transmission. For instance, stage 13, the first post-terrestrial stage, indicates the receptive function of the Neurosomatic circuit, stage 14 gives the integration aspect of that circuit with stage 15 communicating from that circuit. Flatley writes, "When considering the tarot, it's probably more helpful and less abstract to think of the three functions of each circuit as feeling-thinking-action (or sensation-mentation-creation)." I completely disagree with this; for me it adds confusion being that they each have a circuit of their own, C2, C3 and C1. But lest we forget, these are merely maps and models so if it works for you to access that territory, it works; it doesn't matter what I think.

I also found a couple of small issues with the copy editing. The timeline gets confusing when the book appears to say the Beatles broke up in 1965 (p. 38). They actually dissolved in 1970. I didn't understand how the timeline jumps from 1965 to 1970 then back to 1966 until I realized the likelihood a mistake occurred. Page 190 under C7 calls stage 1 thinking when it should be feeling according to Flatley's designation. I saw 3 or four typos, but so what? Except for the timeline thing these errors don't interfere with comprehending the material.

All in all, I thoroughly enjoyed the book and commend the author, a true Evolutionary Agent, for all the hard work and time he devoted to help bring the work of Timothy Leary to a wider and perhaps younger audience. As R.U. Sirius states in the Foreword, "In The Occult Timothy Leary, Joseph L. Flatley gives you the big picture. And what a picture it is!"